Putin's pact with the devils

One of the benefits the restoration of Christianity has brought Russia since 1991 is that almost all Russian politicians can publicly say that God is on their side against the devil.

The church hasn't been especially helpful, however, in inculcating the lesson that, for more than a thousand years of European history, the real fight isn't between God and the devil, but between those on earth, crusaders or infidels, who wield the bigger guns. Looking retrospectively back over the history of countless crusades, it should be obvious that the spoils of victory have also determined how the historians would describe the outcome. In history, God never backed the losers, nor the devil the winners.

It was Raymond VI, the count of Toulouse against whom Pope Innocent III declared the Albigensian Crusade of 1209, who saw the personal downside of this problem more succinctly than most. Among the heretical beliefs, which the crusaders were inspired to root out that year in what was really a civil war between impoverished northern France and the prosperous south, there was the idea that if the world is full of evil, the devil must have created it.
And so, according to what was called the dualist or Cathar heresy of the time, the devil must be working through the church and other institutions which claimed to be on God's side. Raymond's contribution to the heresy was the complaint that all politicians have harbored ever since - the devil must have created the world, he said, "because nothing that ever happens in it goes my way".

When President Vladimir Putin issued the first of his national election campaign speeches last week, you can believe that God was on the side of all the things the president and his men are standing for. They are for doubling Russia's Gross Domestic Product in 10 years (that's annual growth of 10 percent per annum, roughly twice the current rate). They are also for more competition in the marketplace; for less bureaucracy in administration; more flexible and predictable taxation; more effective ministers of state; and greater parliamentary influence over government.

It doesn't require much religion to understand that nowhere in the president's call to arms was there the old-fashioned attack on the devil. In the days of president Boris Yeltsin, that was invariably the Communist Party and their fellow-travellers in parliament who formed the obstructive majority in the state Duma.

Facing growing electoral support for left-of-center critics of the government, Putin chose to position himself closer to them than to their targets, with just the slightest of objections to "unclear ideological positions and insincerity" in politics. "Those who are not afraid to call businessmen robbers and bloodsuckers", Putin added, "are not ashamed to lobby the interests of big companies". If this is the toughest Putin intends to be on the Communist Party for the elections due in December, it is also a hint that the devil (read the donations of the Yukos oil company) might have corrupted the communist leadership, and that Putin is already on the path they should return to.

In the days of Raymond vs Innocent, it was sometimes possible to avoid a fight by arranging a disputation between the advocates of God and advocates of heresy, to allow the logic of the arguments to prevail. Since the Russian media are virtually closed to the left, and it has been reduced to an ineffectual minority in the Duma, the only serious disputation of this kind that takes place in Russia is the concealed faction-fighting behind the walls of the Kremlin. It is therefore from Putin's speech-making that the keys to the disputation must be sought. And from last week's address to parliament, there is the notable fact that Putin not only omitted mentioning the Yeltsinite devil, he also omitted to identify any other.
When he proclaimed himself for the god of GDP growth, he could have warned against the scourge of oil-exporting economies known to economists as the Dutch Disease, when concentration of revenues in the oil sector cripples diversification of industry and growth of employment. All Putin said was that unemployment in Russia is on the rise again, and that the proportion of Russians in poverty remains unchanged since the crash of 1998.

When the president spoke for the god of competitiveness, he could have railed against the increasing concentration of Russian corporate capital. But then how might he explain the fact that he himself encouraged the sale of the state shareholding of Slavneft oil company to Sibneft and Tyumen Oil Company (TNK); then approved TNK's sale to British Petroleum; and finally encouraged Sibneft's merger with Yukos. With his artful advisors, perhaps Putin believes that the fewer devils there are in the world, the easier time God and the faithful will have to resist and control them.

But that's an argument he would have a hard time persuading Russian voters to accept. The two touchstone words for the devil which Russian voters all understand were missing from the president's speech - oligarch and corruption.

Back in France in 1209, when Raymond VI realized he had no chance of winning a disputation with the Pope's men; when he calculated that what the crusaders were really after was his castles, his tax revenues, his wealthy towns and industries, the count contrived the idea of accepting all of Innocent's demands, and renouncing the heresies of which he was accused.

He then proposed joining the crusade himself, ensuring that its target would be the dominions of his neighbor and cousin, Raymond-Roger Trencavel, viscount of Beziers. This was a temporary success, at least for the count of Toulouse. When Beziers fell, Arnauld-Amaury, the Pope's legate and commander of the crusaders, ordered everyone in the town to be slaughtered. Asked how the crusaders should decide whether to spare the faithful catholics from the heretics, Arnauld issued one of the most famous pronouncements in the history of fanaticism - "Kill them all," he said. "God will recognize his own."

In the Russian crusade since 1991, Arnauld's policy has been that of the so-called reformers, now grouped in the small parliamentary party called the Union of Right Forces. Ex-prime minister Yegor Gaidar, ex-Yeltsin favorite Boris Nemtsov, Anatoly Chubais, chief executive of the electricity monopoly, and their henchmen still favor that approach, ideologically speaking. Several of the oligarchs who have financed them continue to use these tactics as they raid those sectors of the Russian economy that are not yet under their control - paper and pulp, electricity, agribusiness. Before last week's speech, the president was lobbied by some members of the Duma to pronounce himself against such tactics, and the banners under which they fly. He refused to do so.

Was this because the president accepts that election campaigns are always pacts with the devil? If so, there is plenty of time still, along with the example of Raymond VI's tale, to judge which side God will end up on, and at what price. Bear in mind, though, what the medieval politicians understood better than the theologians. The price is paid on earth now, not in heaven later.