New York, USA - A panel of academics took a cool look at the increasingly heated issue of evolution versus ''intelligent design'' on Thursday, variously holding up the latter as a cultural battle, a global phenomenon or even a brilliant marketing scheme.
Skip to next paragraph The ``Darwin's Legacy'' discussion, convened in conjunction with the American Museum of Natural History's exhibit on the naturalist who developed the theory of evolution, came as legal battles played out over the teaching of evolution and ''intelligent design'' in U.S. schools.
Intelligent design holds that some aspects of nature are so complex they must be the work of an unnamed designer or higher power, as opposed to the result of random natural selection as argued by Darwin.
Policies that would promote teaching alternatives to evolution are being considered in at least 30 states, and the Kansas Board of Education earlier this month approved new public school science standards that cast doubt on the theory of evolution.
In Dover, Pennsylvania, a local school board was ousted over its requiring that intelligent design be taught in classrooms, and a group of parents has sued saying that violates the constitutional separation of churchresent everything about the North that they disliked.''
The result, he said, was the ``red state-blue state clash -- It's not science versus religion as such -- but very much a cultural clash that we've got in America today.'' Others concurred, saying that the schism was part and parcel of a broader cultural war over contentious issues like abortion, gay rights and gun control.
But the University of Wisconsin-Madison's Ronald Numbers viewed the phenomenon as a growing global issue, saying intelligent design had made significant inroads in Australia, throughout Latin America, in Korea and most surprisingly, Russian and even China, which remains a communist state.
``And it's not just a Christian phenomenon,'' he added, citing a Turkish education minister who pushed for intelligent design in schools, as well as inroads made within both Judaism and Islam.
Numbers said that at heart, the proponents of intelligent design ``want to change the definition of science'' to include God, an issue he predicted would end up in the Supreme Court.
``One of the most successful PR campaigns we've seen in recent years,'' he added, ``is intelligent design.''
Finally Edward Larson, who won the Pulitzer Prize for his 1998 book on the Scopes monkey trials, held that the debate boiled down in the United States to what is being taught in high school biology classes.
In the only remark to draw applause from the large audience, Larson said the ``problem is partisan officials trying to tell science teachers how to do their jobs,'' and for ''blatantly religious motivations.'' He also noted that ``so far, the issue hasn't affect scientific funding.''
President George W. Bush, a vocal Christian, has stated he believes that intelligent design should be taught in classrooms alongside evolution, as has British Prime Minister Tony Blair.
Opponents say it is thinly veiled version of creationism, the Bible version of human origins, which the Supreme Court barred from the classroom decades ago.