A Cult by Any Other Name: Al Qaeda

We've called Al Qaeda many things in the last few months--a network, an organization, a cell--but rarely what it really is: a cult. It's been obvious from the start. But we haven't recognized it, and until we do, we can't defeat it. We've bought the ruses Osama bin Laden's been selling us, the same masterful ones he has used to con so many otherwise sane Muslims into service.

The twin causes Bin Laden invokes are Islam and Arab self-determination, and armies rise to serve him. No need to convert or dogmatize. Believers are ready-made. The Koran and Arab realpolitik do the recruiting and, best of all, serve as smelly red herrings to throw would-be skeptical recruits and even angry American retaliators off the scent.

Of course, Al Qaeda has no more to do with Islam than Jim Jones had to do with Christianity. And it is no more a bona fide terrorist organization than was Charles Manson's family. It's a charismatic psychopath's bid for immortality via the macabre enactment of his paranoid fantasies. Nothing more. We and the Arab world must wake up to this fact, and stop playing our scripted roles in Bin Laden's megalomaniacal delusion. Bin Laden's grand plan to start a world war between Islam and the West--the true goal of the Sept. 11 attacks--is reminiscent of Manson's confessed motivation for the Tate and La Bianca murders of 1969. By having his followers slaughter a few high-profile white bourgeois and scrawl "pig" on the wall in blood, Manson had hoped to frame black militants for the crimes, thereby sparking a race war.

Ditto Bin Laden. But because Bin Laden's operatives bear a resemblance to Palestinian suicide bombers, we have labeled them terrorists and declared this a wide-ranging global war. Never mind that suicide pacts are the stock in trade of most cults. Remember Jonestown and Heaven's Gate? So are terroristic mass murders, such as the Aum Supreme Truth cult's 1995 sarin gas attack in the Tokyo subway.

Because Al Qaeda members resemble and have hidden under the umbrella of other Islamic militants like the Taliban, we have mistaken them for Islamists. Never mind that pseudo-religious fanaticism is integral to almost all cults. Because Al Qaeda says it hates the United States, we mistakenly have come to believe that it represents widespread Arab and Muslim dislike for our freedom-loving way of life.

This hatred for the U.S. government is a quality Al Qaeda shares with American cults such as Manson's family, David Koresh's Branch Davidians, the Montana Freemen and loner offshoots such as Timothy McVeigh. The U.S. represents an easy target.

Bin Laden is a classic Svengali, which is why we must terminate him or discredit him or both. Others may inherit his fiefdom, but they are unlikely to maintain it as effectively. His cult, like all scams, will work only so long as we accept it on its terms.

The messianic Saudi and his outfit are the problem. Not militant Islam, not Iraq, not the Arab "street," not even terrorism. Those are all disguises, albeit each with its own set of troubles. For now, fighting a focused war on Al Qaeda--not a global one against ill-defined foes--should be the quest. The sooner we eradicate "the base," the sooner the perceived larger threat it pretends to represent will disintegrate into its jury-rigged component parts, and the sooner we can all return to fractious foreign policy as usual.

Norah Vincent is a freelance journalist who lives in New York City